Unexpected Item Forces Coca-Cola Recall in Two Midwest States

Person drinking soda from a glass mug
closeup woman drinking ice cola in the glass.food and beverage concept.

Coca-Cola consumers in Wisconsin and Illinois unknowingly purchased over 10,000 cans potentially contaminated with plastic particles, the latest troubling incident in a growing wave of food safety recalls across America.

Key Takeaways

  • 864 cases (10,368 cans) of Coca-Cola Original Taste 12-packs have been recalled in Wisconsin and Illinois due to possible plastic contamination
  • The FDA classified this as a Class II recall, indicating temporary or medically reversible health consequences
  • Affected products have specific identifiers: date code SEP2925MDA, time stamp 1100-1253, with specific UPC codes
  • Reyes Coca-Cola Bottling in Milwaukee voluntarily initiated the recall on March 6, 2024
  • This recall joins a concerning pattern of recent food safety issues involving foreign materials in consumer products

Details of the Coca-Cola Recall

Reyes Coca-Cola Bottling has voluntarily recalled 864 cases (10,368 cans) of Coca-Cola Original Taste from Illinois and Wisconsin markets due to potential plastic contamination. The recall specifically targets products with date code SEP2925MDA, time stamp 1100-1253, can UPC 0 49000-00634 6, and 12-can pack UPC 0 49000-02890 4. The bottling company initiated this recall on March 6, with the FDA formally classifying it on March 24. Consumers who purchased these products are advised to stop consumption immediately.

Health Implications and FDA Classification

The Food and Drug Administration has categorized this incident as a Class II recall, which indicates moderate health risk. This classification recognizes that while serious health consequences are unlikely, the contamination isn’t harmless either. The potential presence of plastic particles in consumable beverages creates genuine consumer safety concerns, even if the health impacts might be temporary rather than life-threatening. Neither Coca-Cola nor the FDA has released information about how many consumers may have already consumed affected products.

Coca-Cola’s Response and Consumer Advice

Coca-Cola has emphasized that this recall stems from quality control issues rather than confirmed injuries or illnesses. The company’s messaging focuses on their commitment to product standards, framing the recall as a proactive measure. Consumers in possession of the affected products have been advised to either dispose of them or return them to their place of purchase for a full refund. Detailed identification information is available on the FDA’s website to help consumers determine if their purchases are part of the affected batch.

“Reyes Coca-Cola Bottling is voluntarily recalling 864 cases of 12-pack Coca-Cola Classic in 12-oz cans in Illinois and Wisconsin,” a company spokesperson said Wednesday in an emailed statement to USA TODAY. “The cases are being withdrawn because they did not meet our high-quality standards. We are taking this voluntary action because nothing is more important to us than providing high-quality products to the people who drink our beverages.”

Part of a Larger Pattern of Food Safety Concerns

This Coca-Cola recall doesn’t exist in isolation but joins a troubling series of recent food safety issues. Several major brands including Stouffer’s and Lean Cuisine have recently recalled frozen entrées due to foreign material contamination. The frequency of these recalls raises legitimate questions about quality control processes in America’s food production systems. For consumers, this pattern creates justifiable concerns about the safety and integrity of processed foods and beverages, even from established name brands with presumed rigorous quality control standards.

Transparency and Communication Issues

Notably absent from this recall was a broad public communication strategy. No press release was issued directly to consumers, leaving many potentially unaware of the contamination risk. The FDA’s classification occurred nearly three weeks after the initial recall action, creating a significant gap where consumers may have continued purchasing or consuming affected products. This communication lag highlights the need for more immediate and transparent food safety notifications in a system that often prioritizes corporate messaging over prompt consumer warnings.

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR