Amid intense scrutiny, Stephen Feinberg faced Senate questioning on the delicate dance of diplomacy with Russia while sidestepping direct criticism.
Quick Takes
- Feinberg deflected direct questions about labeling Russia as the aggressor in Ukraine.
- His reluctance aligns with a broader U.S. policy of diplomacy over accusations amidst ongoing negotiations.
- Feinberg emphasized confidence in President Trump’s negotiation skills with Russia.
- The Senate hearing highlighted divisions in the approach toward Russia between parties.
Feinberg Faces the Senate Armed Services Committee
Stephen Feinberg, the nominee for deputy secretary of Defense, navigated challenging questions from the Senate Armed Services Committee regarding Russia’s military actions in Ukraine. Feinberg avoided directly criticizing Russia during the hearing, emphasizing the fragile diplomatic negotiations ongoing with Russia. Despite intense pressure from Senator Mark Kelly and others, Feinberg chose not to give a straightforward answer, instead focusing on his limited knowledge of the specific diplomatic details.
This reticence was reflective of the broader Trump administration approach, which has avoided explicitly condemning Russia’s actions in Ukraine. Feinberg did, however, acknowledge in written testimony that there was a “further invasion” by Russia in February 2022. This subtle acknowledgment highlights the complex, and often controversial, diplomacy at play.
Diplomatic Strategies and Roadblocks
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth described the situation as “very complicated,” emphasizing that engaging in direct finger-pointing could hinder progress toward peace. This approach of avoiding explicit blame aligns with President Trump’s recent shift in rhetoric, which includes critical comments directed at Ukraine’s President Zelenskyy and a hesitant attitude toward labeling Russia’s actions as an invasion.
Feinberg’s response drew criticisms from Senate Democrats, like Sen. Tim Kaine and Sen. Tammy Duckworth, who called for transparency and a greater acknowledgment of Russia as the provocateur. There is concern over whether diplomacy that avoids calling out aggression might embolden adversarial actions without accountability.
A Look Forward: Feinberg’s Defense Strategy
Beyond the immediate diplomatic concerns, Feinberg’s hearing revealed his future plans should he be confirmed. These include addressing ammunition shortages, enhancing the Pentagon’s venture capital initiatives, and expanding autonomous vehicle projects with a focus on China. The European Defense Initiative and its role in deterring Russia were also scrutinized, with Feinberg suggesting a reevaluation of resource allocation.
Feinberg’s hearing painted a picture of an administration balancing on the fine line between diplomacy and accountability—a tightrope where word choice has as much weight as action.
Sources:
- Two Trump officials decline to say Russia started the war in Ukraine
- Defense deputy secretary pick avoids saying Russia invaded Ukraine – POLITICO
